Deviant Leisure Explores a Radical Criminological Framework to Examine Neo-Liberal Capitalism. Can Deviant Leisure Be Revisioned by Feminism to Include the Emerging ‘Other’?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i3p103Keywords:
Deviant Leisure, Neoliberal Capitalism, Creative PhD, Feminism, Social Harm, Mental Health IssuesAbstract
Deviant Leisure is a radical departure from criminology. Finding its home with the ultra-realists it uses concepts from Lacan and Zizek as building blocks to support this revisioning. It is uplifted and improved by a merger with feminism. Social harm is a key concept in Deviant Leisure. It has the potential to transform policy making. Employing a post-disciplinary space, this article combines Deviant Leisure, feminist, and mental health perspectives. It explores the inherent criminological capacities of capitalism. The research deploys the genre of a Creative PhD which reframes the 70s and extends its theorization through a crime novel as an artefact.
References
Adair, V. (2008). The Missing Story of Ourselves: Poor Women, Power and the Politics of Feminist Representation, 20 (1), NWSA Journal, 1-25, JSTOR, https://jstor.org/stable/40071250?seq=1
Atwood, M. [1985] (2010). The handmaid’s tale. London: Vintage.
Ayres, T. (2019). Substance use in the Night-Time Economy: Deviant Leisure?
Raymen, T & Smith, O eds. Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspectives on Leisure and Harm, Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture, 135-60, accessed 7.7.2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17736-2_7.
Brabazon, T. (2020). ‘From bad apples to zombies? Walking dead leadership in the contemporary university’, Fast Capitalism, accessed 17.8.2020.
Brabazon, T. (2020). Tara Brabazon’s 12 Rules for (academic) life – a stroppy feminist’s guide through teaching, lear…[podcast] Libsyn, 09/12/2020 accessed 13.9.2020, https://directory.libsyn.com/shows/view/id/tarabrabazon
Brabazon, T., Lyndall-Knight, T. & Hills, N. (2020). The creative PhD: Challenges, opportunities, reflection. Bingley: Emerald.
Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Curtain, M., & Sanson, K. eds. (2016). Precarious Creativity: Global Media, Local Labor. University of California Press: Directory of Open Access Books, accessed 24.4.2020, https://doabooks.org/doab?func=search&uiLanguage=en&template=&query=Precarious+Creativity%3A+Global+Media%2C+Local+Labor+.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Crow’s Nest: Allen & Unwin.
Day, E., & Keeley, G. (2008). My father, RD Laing: He solved other people’s problems – but not his own. Theguardian.com, accessed 21.4.2020, https://theguardian.com/books/2008/jun/01/mentalhealth.society.
Dewey, J. [1933] (2011). How we think, Heath & Co. Boston: Project Gutenberg, https://gutenberg.org/files/37423/37423-h/37423-h.htm.
Freire, P. [1970] (2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma. London: Penguin.
Hall, S. (2012). The Solicitation of the Trap: On transcendence and transcendental materialism in advanced consumer capitalism. Human Studies Special issue on Transcendence and Transgression. 35(3), 365-381, Google Scholar, accessed 22.7.2020.
Hall, S., Kuldova, T., & Horsley, M. eds. (2020). Crime, harm & consumerism. London: Routledge.
Heyes, C. (2002). ‘Identity Politics’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Sydney University, accessed 21.7.2020, https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2004/entries/identity-politics/.
Hocking, J. (2012). Gough Whitlam: His Time; the Biography, Volume II.
Carlton, Vic.: The Miegunyah Press.
Holland. E. (2013). Deleuze and Guattari’s a thousand plateaus. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Kellehear, A. (1993). The unobtrusive researcher: A guide to methods, Chapter 1-2, pp. 1-31. St. Leonard’s, NSW: Allen & Unwin, accessed 25.3.2020, https://sociologyaustralia.allenandunwin.com.s3-website-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/files/unobtrus.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3QU7PbtgPH1foEJvGPFhovb7LeTrDvLImhzKrxRMYgwq7vmI59oi2S32w
Kotze, J. (2018). ‘Criminology vs. Zemiology? Yes, Please! On the Refusal of Choice between False Alternatives’, in Boukli, A & Kotze, J eds., Zemiology: Reconnecting Crime and Social Harm, Critical Criminological Perspectives, pp. 85-106, accessed 21.4.2020, https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/book/10.1007%2F978-3-319-76312-5
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A study in moral theory. London: Duckworth.
McGowan, J. (2002) Democracy’s children: Intellectuals and the Rise of Cultural Politics. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press. Open Access Creative Commons 4.0, accessed 3.4.2020, https://jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt207g6r2.
Medley, C. (2019). The Business of Resistance: Feminist Pornography and the Limits of Leisure Industries as Sites of Political Resistance, in Raymen, T and Thomas, O eds. Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspectives on Leisure and Harm, Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture, pp. 237-57, accessed 15.72020, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17736-2_11
Meyers, D. (1999) [2004]. ‘Feminist Perspectives on the Self’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Sydney University, accessed 21.7.2020, https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2004/entries/feminism-self/
Musur, K. (2012). What are the implications of adopting a zemiological framework as an alternative to criminology when analyzing phenomena of global crime justice and security?, Global Crime and Insecurity, accessed 30.4.2020, academia.edu, https://academia.edu/9740337/What_are_the_implications_of_adopting_a_zemiological_framework_as_an_alternative_to_criminology_when_analysing_phenomena_of_global_crime_justice_and_security.
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. London: Secker & Warburg.
Plath, S. (1963) [2013]. The bell jar. London: Faber & Faber.
Raymen, T. (2020). Unpublished. ‘A Disquieting Suggestion for Criminology’, Chapter 1 in The Assumption of Harmless: Revitalizing the Concept of Social Harm.
Raymen, T. (2019a). The enigma of social harm and the barrier of liberalism: Why Zemiology needs a theory of the good. Justice Power and Resistance. 3(1), 133-163, accessed 25.6.2020.
Raymen, T. (2019b). The Paradox of Parkour: Conformity, Resistance and Spatial Exclusion, Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspectives on Leisure and Harm, Raymen, T & Smith, O eds., 349-377, accessed 10.6.2020, Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17736-2_16.
Raymen, T. (2019c). Lifestyle Gambling in Accelerated Culture, Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspective on Leisure and Harm, Raymen, T & Smith, O eds., pp. 259-282, Palgrave: Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture.
Raymen, T. (2018). Parkour, deviance and leisure in the late capitalist society. Emerald, Emerald Studies in Deviant Leisure.
Raymen, T., & Smith, O. (2020). Gambling and harm in 24/7 Capitalism: Reflections from the post-disciplinary present’, in Crime, Harm and Consumerism, Hall, S. Kuldova, T. & Horsley, M. eds., London: Routledge, 123-139.
Raymen, T., & Smith, O. eds. (2019). Deviant leisure: Criminological perspectives on leisure and harm. Palgrave, Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media & Culture.
Raymen, T. & Smith, O. (2019). The Deviant Leisure Perspective: A theoretical introduction’ in Raymen, T. & Smith O. (2019) eds. Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspectives on Leisure and Harm, Palgrave Studies in
Crime, Media and Culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Chapter 2, 17-44, accessed 15.3.2020, e-book https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-17736-2.pdf
Raymen, T. & Smith, O. (2019) Deviant leisure: A critical criminological perspective for the twenty-first century. Critical Criminology. 27(1), 115-130.
Redhead, S. (2019). Real ultras and ultra-realism: Deviant leisure cultures, high theory and raw realism, in Raymen, T & Smith O, 2019, eds. Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspectives on Leisure and Harm, Palgrave Studies in
Crime, Media and Culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Chapter 2, 87-102, accessed 15.3.2020, e-book https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-17736-2.pdf
Smith, O., & Raymen, T. (2018). Deviant Leisure: A criminological perspective, Theoretical Criminology, 22(1), 63-82.
Raymen, T. & Smith, O. eds. (2019). Deviant Leisure: Criminological perspectives on leisure and harm, Palgrave (Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media & Culture).
Raymen, T. & Smith, O. (2019). The Deviant Leisure Perspective: A theoretical introduction’ in Raymen, T & Smith O, 2019, eds. Deviant Leisure: Criminological perspectives on leisure and harm, Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture, Palgrave Macmillan, Chapter 2, pp. 17-44, accessed 15.3.2020, e-book https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-17736-2.pdf
Raymen, T. (2019c). Lifestyle Gambling in Accelerated Culture’, Deviant Leisure: Criminological Perspective on Leisure and Harm, Raymen, T. & Smith,
O. eds., Palgrave, 259-282, (Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture).
Smith, O. (2014). Contemporary adulthood and the night-time economy. London: Springer.
Tennant-Moore, H. (2016). Wreck and order. London, New York: Hogarth.
Winlow, S. (2019). What lies beneath? Some notes on ultra-realism, and the intellectual foundations of the “Deviant Leisure” Perspective, in Raymen, T. & Smith O. (2019). eds. Deviant Leisure: criminological perspectives on leisure and harm, Palgrave Studies in Crime, Media and Culture, Palgrave
Macmillan, Chapter 3, pp. 45-65, accessed 15.3.2020, e-book, https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.flinders.edu.au/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-17736-2.pdf
Winlow, S. & Hall, S. (2013) Rethinking social exclusion: The end of the social? London: Sage.
Woolf, V [1923] (1992). Mrs. Dalloway, Penguin, London.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies
International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies applies the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic Licence (CC BY-NC 2.0)
